Tony Abbott and Australia Day 2012
Tony Abbott is surely a fool.
People in Australia and around the world have read of the extraordinary events that occurred in Canberra on Australia Day (26 January for international visitors). The headlines paint a pretty scary picture.
There’s also been a great deal of commentary about it already (and you can expect to read more in the coming days or until the media find something new to obsess about). There are some that I agree with and even more that I disagree with. For starters I can’t agree with the statements of ‘violence’ or ‘riots’ because the people I know that were participating in the protest said it was peaceful. I have no reason not to trust them; they are themselves non-violent people.
I won’t go into the condemnation of condemnations but I think it is disappointing that one of the most senior politicians in the country would have the insensitivity of telling Indigenous Australians that a lot has changed since the tent embassy was first established in 1972, and that people should move on. It would also suggest that Mr Abbott is not as in touch with the issues and challenges of concern for Indigenous Australians as he’d like us to believe.
For me the most disappointing thing is some of the utter rubbish passed off as commentary. It’s not particularly surprising to read from commentators that the protestors misunderstood Mr Abbott and overreacted, and that this somehow had put a dark cloud over the day’s celebrations. It’s a pity that these so-called commentators didn’t bother to think about the nature and context of Mr Abbott’s comments.
Unfortunately for these commentators they’ve ignored the very essence of Mr Abbott’s comments – that things have changed and people should move on.
That somehow a national apology makes up for 200+ years of dislocation, displacement and despair is ludicrous and shows Mr Abbott to be insensitive. That somehow the massive gap in health and education is a sign of how much things have changed for the better shows how dangerously out-of-touch Mr Abbott (including the commentators and mainstream media) is with the issues and concerns of Indigenous Australians.
It’s also pretty disappointing that Mr Abbott made such comments with the You Me Unity report released last week recommending that Indigenous Australia finally be recognised in the constitution, including the removal of sections that sanctify racially discriminatory laws. Though who is entirely surprised he made insensitive comments given his comments about the recommendations contained within the You Me Unity report. When commenting on the report he was quick to add that he didn’t support removing the racially discriminatory sections. He argued amazingly that somehow those sections were essential to the capacity of the government to govern; that somehow removing those sections weakens our democracy.
For someone who claims he cares for helping Indigenous Australians attain their goals and aspirations, his comments on Australia Day and those following the release of the You Me Unity recommendations, reveal the opposite. Indigenous Australians have every right to be mad as hell with the comments made by Tony Abbott. And they have every right to protest his comments and positions.
Ultimately the scenes created by the hysteria of law enforcement agencies could have been avoided if Mr Abbott had bothered to excuse himself from the event he was at and speak with the protesters. I’m sure if he had bothered to be the man of his convictions like we’re told he is, he would’ve had no problems discussing his comments with the protesters. He was certainly given a perfect opportunity to correct false impressions, speak with people about his comments, and to calm the situation; to prove himself a leader but failed.
Ultimately, Mr Abbott’s comments reveal he isn’t interested in having a national conversation about a day many in the community view as the day they were invaded.
-
1
Pingback on Jan 31st, 2012 at 1:58 am
[...] found Alex Schlotzer confirming my views about Abbott’s racist dog whistling at http://alexschlotzer.wordpress.com/2012/01/28/tony-abbott-and-australia-day-2012/ Tony Abbott’s lack of concern for the Aboriginal cause about which he protests so much are made [...]















January 31, 2012 at 12:49 pm
Hi Alex, I’m glad you liked my pome, which as you can see above drew some inspiration from reading this post here. Not sure if you saw the very latest edited version, but for your benefit and your readers who may not have the time to visit polliepomes the last verse now reads…….
“Don’t give me hullabaloo!
One shoe! I really needed two!
You bastards should’ve let me through!
I’d ‘ve grabbed the pair, stepped into them!
Shoo-in for PM without a bloody coup!
January 31, 2012 at 1:21 pm
Hi patriciawa. I did enjoy your poem and loved the parody of ‘Cockadoodledoo’; you captured the situation perfectly.
For everyone interested in the pome after reading the last verse, check it out at http://polliepomes.wordpress.com/2012/01/30/shoeless-in-canberra/
Thanks again.
Alex
January 31, 2012 at 2:25 am
Did the security people fear that the PM was in danger ob being attacked, or were they concerned that there was danger of the glass breaking.
By removing the PM and Mr. Abbott, it would mean that the protesters would be likely to pull back, as they did in minutes.
Where is the evidence that the phone call to Ms. Sattler led to the protest, which was certainly noisy but not that violent. Why could not it be as Mr. Hodges said, that he was offering to arrange a interview for the embassy people to voice their reaction to Mr. Abbott’s comments.
Where is the evidence that Mr. Hodges set out to incite a riot not used racism to stir up trouble.
It is said that many knew Mr.Abbott was there and aware of his comments. It is said that they were already moving towards the restaurant.
Where is the evidence that anyone incited the protest. It is more likely that it is something that just happened, owing to Mr. Abbott making comments which much of the media, according to Mr.Abbott misunderstood.
Mr. Abbott then turns up in the vicinity of two thousand people celebrating 40 years on the embassy. less than a hundred metres away.
So much ado over nothing. Yes it was ugly, but the worse security breach in thirty years.
January 31, 2012 at 10:56 am
Thanks for your comment ‘Catching up’.
I think you’re spot on about how this incident has been reported. From all of the footage available online, it strongly appears that the security over-reacted to the situation.
Seems as though, and perhaps what you may be alluding to, is that Abbott had every intention of causing controversy, knowing that his comments were inflammatory.
We can only hope the media actually focus on the cause of the situation – Tony Abbott’s stupid comments.
Thanks again.
Alex
January 30, 2012 at 2:36 pm
I don’t see Abbott comments at that presser as simply insensitive. I see them as a subtle dog whistle of malicious intent. The early report by Sky News that he said the Tent Embassy should be moved was either hoped for or planned. The backlash which resulted in the PM’s calm and leaderlike response, that lost shoe and fall from dignity notwithstanding,
has pushed him into hysterical hyperboleon the role of Tony Hodges and the PM’s office and who knew what and when! Since when have the movements of the PM and LOTO on Australia Day been state secrets?
You are right to conflate Abbott’s comments about the
Tent Embassy with his already expressed reservations about the referendum on the inclusion of Aboriginal people in the Constitution. His Australia Day antics have made short work of his need to push the No case there.
January 30, 2012 at 3:30 pm
Thanks particiawa for your comment.
You’re quite right that Tony Abbott’s comments were a subtle dog whistle of malicious intent (loved how you phrased that) and I should’ve been more forceful in the my language about it.
I totally agree with everything you said and I’m sure many visitors will be in agreement.
Thanks again
Alex
January 29, 2012 at 3:19 pm
To recognize Indigenous peoples in our constitution I think would do us more harm than good. We need unity, equality, reconciliation. We need them to stop playing the victim and get with the program. If we acknowledge them without acknowledging everyone else, do we not place them higher than ourselves and others? they are humans after all.
January 29, 2012 at 4:25 pm
Hi Alan R,
Interesting position you take there. I’m not sure how recognising Australia’s original inhabitants puts them above anyone else when it simply recognises that they were here before Australia was ‘discovered’.
At present they aren’t afforded such recognition and it’s certainly a part of reconciliation. It does no good to say that things are getting better when the evidence doesn’t support such assessments.
If we want to build unity, equality and reconciliation then we need to recognise First Australians.
Thanks again.
Alex
January 28, 2012 at 8:44 pm
Really interesting opinion piece. It’s hard to know exactly what went on, I think it is sad though that all the world will now know of Jan 26 is the protests and this has damaged the positives that Australia Day should also be about as well.
January 29, 2012 at 1:48 pm
Hey aussiedollars thanks for your comment.
It is sad that the world saw Jan 26 as a day of ‘riots’ and ‘a fleeing Prime Minister’. You’re too that we should be using the day for discussing the positives about our country.
One of things we could’ve been doing this Jan 26 was re-starting our national conversation about recognising Indigenous Australians in the constitution. Unfortunately this will probably have set back that conversation.
Thanks again.
Alex